Dear all, I'm going again to ask for co-mainter permissions on the Gearman module to be able to close open issues. Because some of the issues are opened for seven years: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Gearman
Some of the issues are closed in unauthorized release: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=100594 BR, Alexei > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Alexei Pastuchov <i...@maximka.de> > To: dormando <dorma...@rydia.net> > Date: 19 December 2014 at 16:35 > Subject: Re: Gearman-1.12 > > Hi, > > here is a short report about my work. > > - Bug 46373 > use $worker->work( stop_if => sub { return shift } ) instead of $worker->work( > stop_if => sub { return shift } ) > see bug 89382 > > - Bug 78710 > it's an issue for a maintainer. I'm a volunteer yet. > > - 85191 > lost connection, etc. will be managed in work sub by calling uncache_sock if > some thing gone wrong. > The behaviour of Worker.pm does not changed after patching. > - Bug 85192 fixed > > - Bug 88054 > the is no timeout option in Client v1.12. command_timeout=30 on default is > used > in _option_request sub > I'm not sure you'll use command_timeout property in proposed way in > _get_js_sock. > > - Bug 89037 > fixed > > - Bug 91973 > use of environment variable GEARMAN_SERVERS will solve the issue > > - Bug 94403 > it's not an issue in v1.12 > $jssock check is applied in Taskset->add_task > > - Bug 100594 > is fixed > > - I've added two new tickets: 101012, 101013 > > - cpan tester report 586f5968-8489-11e4-adb9-802de0bfc7aa is - ugly - fixed > too > > All described issues are in > https://github.com/p-alik/perl-Gearman-Client/tree/upstream and on > https://metacpan.org/pod/release/PALIK/Gearman-1.12.001/lib/Gearman/Client.pm > Your feedback is welcome. > > Please give me co-maintenance permissions If you are interested in my further > support. > > Regards, > Alexei > > > > dormando <dorma...@rydia.net> hat am 16. Dezember 2014 um 19:39 geschrieben: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > if you'd like to maintain it, hop on the public mailing list. Look over > > the RT buglist and any PR's in github and create tested integration trees > > for upstreaming. I'll review each tree and cut a release from it, and if > > you're able to cut things down well enough I'll give you commit and upload > > bits. > > > > So far nobody else has stepped forward. We need someone who'll actively > > watch the community and deal with open requests. > > > > thanks! > > > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Alexei Pastuchov wrote: > > > > > Thank you for quick response. > > > I've imported v1.12 in upstream > > > https://github.com/p-alik/perl-Gearman-Client/tree/upstream and started > > > failed tests bug > > > fixing > > > http://www.cpantesters.org/distro/G/Gearman.html?oncpan=1&distmat=1&version=1.12 > > > Then I would add SUBMIT_JOB_HIGH_BG-solution from the master branch in > > > v1.12 > > > too. > > > If you have a new maintainer candidate, let him know about my work. > > > If no, let me maintain it because I'm using the package over a year in our > > > production environment and now have to start to bug fixing gearmand > > > self. https://bugs.launchpad.net/gearmand/+bug/1348865 > > > > > > I never used Gearman::Server, but I would maintain it too if you mind. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Alexei > > > > > > > dormando <dorma...@rydia.net> hat am 16. Dezember 2014 um 08:21 > > > > geschrieben: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > I'm looking for a new maintainer on the Gearman::Client and > > > > Gearman::Server modules. In the meantime I shipped what was already > > > > sitting in the repos but unreleased. > > > > > > > > Need someone trustworthy who has the time to carefully review patches > > > > and > > > > avoid regressions for any production users of this old, relatively > > > > stable > > > > codebase. > > > > > > > > Sorry for the neglect for so many years on it :/ I feel pretty bad for > > > > not > > > > trying harder. > > > > > > > > On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Alexei Pastuchov wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > there is a new release of Gearman in CPAN appeared. It’s look like you > > > > > are working on it. > > > > > A few weeks ago I’ve reported a SUBMIT_JOB_HIGH_BG-bug in v1.11 > > > > > https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=100594 > > > > > It is very important for me, because in my company the deployment > > > > > depends on in Debian contained packages. For Gearman it’s currently > > > libgearman-client-perl related to Gearman v.11. > > > > > To be able to create an SUBMIT_JOB_HIGH_BG job I’ve created a v1.11 > > > > > Backport https://github.com/p-alik/perl-Gearman-Client > > > > > But if Debian takes v1.12 without SUBMIT_JOB_HIGH_BG-bug fix, I’ve to > > > > > back port it again. > > > > > I’ll gently ask you if you intend to apply to the ticket appended > > > > > patches? > > > > > If you need any help it would be my pleasure to support you. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Alexei > > > > > > > > > > >
