Hi, I think everyone here has overlooked the last two releases and that has caused confusion. The patch is not needed. The issue is fixed since 0.03.
In general I have no objections against more co-maintainers and I accept all decisions from Florian. But I do not see any need for yet another maintainer. To fix the threads.t test, I follow Harlan’s suggestion and release another version without this test. -- Boris Zentner > Am 30.04.2015 um 23:22 schrieb Florian Ragwitz <[email protected]>: > > I had given Boris (on Cc, hi Boris!) co-maint a while back so he could > release some of his changes, which he did. > > Boris, do you think getting these fixes released is something you could help > with? Would you mind more co-maintainers being added? I certainly have no > objections to that as the original author. > > > > On April 30, 2015 5:11:21 PM EDT, Matt S Trout <[email protected]> wrote: > DAMNIT I CC'ED rafl@ YET AGAIN > > ----- Forwarded message from Matt S Trout <[email protected]> ----- > > Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:00:28 +0000 > From: Matt S Trout <[email protected]> > To: David Golden <[email protected]> > Cc: Harlan Lieberman-Berg <[email protected]>, > [email protected], [email protected], > "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #98340] Release > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 04:47:25PM -0400, David Golden wrote: > FLORA is primary maint, now, so shouldn't this go through him? > > Huh, I wasn't aware there was already an attempted adoption - there doesn't > seem to've been a release yet. > > rafl, whaddya want us to do? > > -- > Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
