Heh. Maybe I’m just getting old but Chad mailed me on Monday. Under 3 working days isn’t me "stopped responding to email" - it’s just me being busy (and ill ;-)
But not a problem. Might be worth clarifying HANDOFF/ADOPTME somewhere "official" though for the next person. Adrian On 31 Jul 2014, at 12:47, Ron Savage <r...@savage.net.au> wrote: > Hi Adrian > > No problem. > > I was responding to this email: > > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.modules/2014/07/msg90947.html > > > On 31/07/14 21:34, Adrian Howard wrote: >> >> On 31 Jul 2014, at 12:28, Ron Savage <r...@savage.net.au> wrote: >> >>> Hi Adrian >>> >>> Sorry if you feel offended. I couldn’t actually define the exact meaning of >>> HANDOFF, and I was available, so I acted. >> >> No offended - just confused. I thought the accepted meaning of HANDOFF was >> >> "Giving co-maint to HANDOFF is a way for the current owner of a module to >> flag that they're happy for someone else to take over ownership of the >> module. You’ll still need to ask the author to adopt the module." - >> http://neilb.org/2013/08/07/adoptme.html >> >> But I’m a tad out of sync with community practices (hence need for handoff >> ;-) so may well be mistaken on what current good practice is. >> >> It’s what I would have wanted anyway — so no harm done. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Adrian >> > > -- > Ron Savage > savage.net.au -- adri...@quietstars.com / +44 (0)7752 419080 / @adrianh / quietstars.com - Get the Agile & Lean UX newsletter here > http://bit.ly/agileleanux -
