On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:35:59PM +0530, Vipin Singh wrote: > Thanks, for sharing the guidelines and suggestions. As per Matt's > suggestion I have registered for Benchmark::OO.
I specifically suggested that Benchmark::OO would be a terrible name. Benchmark::Object appears to be free and would fit with the common naming conventions. The PAUSE index currently shows 237 modules in 78 distributions whose names match /-Object/ and 83 in 23 distributions whose names match /-OO/. If you want to maximise your distribution's findability and make a good first impression, using the common naming convention rather than a more obscure one would seem the better choice. Sorry for missing this email until now. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our CPAN commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
