On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM, David Golden <x...@xdg.me> wrote: >>> But I'll start getting my head around the PAUSE internals anyway. >> >> Good man :) > > From a quick skim, I'd say look at PAUSE::mldistwatch and the > check_for_new subroutine. Also you should look at PAUSE::dist and > examine_pm. The answer isn't there, but if you trace the flow, you'll > probably find where the indexing rules are.
Oh, and the rules are apparently in PAUSE::package. ack around for "index_status". I think the tricky thing will be to only check the existing index in a case insensitive way, but to leave the rest of the processing code using the original case. David -- David Golden <x...@xdg.me> Take back your inbox! → http://www.bunchmail.com/ Twitter/IRC: @xdg
