Hi Brian, > > > The original name I thought of was Condor::QueueParser, because it is > used > > That sounds like a good name to me. It puts Condor related stuff under > a top-level name that users care about. Matt suggested Parse::, but > I've never fancied that top-level. It inverts the important bits and > makes people look in the middle of the name to see why they are using > it. >
True, on the other hand, not sure if is this important to have a Condor root namespace, given that we still don't know if more people are going to contribute with more modules for Condor. I find it possible but unlikely. That said, I feel more comfortable to contribute to an already existant namespace, but let me know what is the best. Anyway, I'm doing some changes in the module itself and POD after some discussion with the Condor developers, so still time to discuss the naming before I submit. Thanks, Samir
