Brian, Thank you for getting back to me. I just want to make sure I understand. Are you suggesting a new toplevel namespace of "SiteCatalyst"? >> >> rationale: >> >> I chose Business::SiteCatalyst because Business is the toplevel >> namespace for most wrappers of commercial software APIs. > > That's not really true, but it doesn't matter. > > How about just SiteCatalyst? >
I really feel SiteCatalyst belongs under Business, joining the ranks of Business::CyberSource, Business::FedEx::RateRequest, Business::PayPal::API, Business::UPS. "SiteCatalyst" is a specific product, by Adobe (formerly Omniture). Thank you -Jennifer On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:38 PM, brian d foy <brian.d....@gmail.com> wrote: > [[ This message was both posted and mailed: see > the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] > > In article <201204202006.q3kk6tpt021...@pause.fiz-chemie.de>, "Perl Authors > Upload Server" <upl...@pause.perl.org> wrote: > >> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: >> >> modid: Business::SiteCatalyst >> DSLIP: RdpOa >> description: interface to Adobe Omniture SiteCatalyst API >> userid: JPINKHAM (Jennifer Pinkham) >> chapterid: 24 (Commercial_Software_Interfaces) >> communities: >> >> similar: > -- > brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org > PAUSE instructions: http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_04about > Archives: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules > Please send all messages back to modules@perl.org with no CC to me.
