[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article <4eb70097....@cpan.org>, Richard Harman <rhar...@cpan.org> wrote: > > This sounds more like an application rather than the implementation of > > a network protocol. We have some thoughts on the use of Net::* > > > > https://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery?ACTION=pause_namingmodules > I opted to put my code under the Net::DNS namespace because those two > Net::DNS modules are what my code subclasses. It seemed to fit together > in my mind. What you build on top of and the thing you produce don't have to have the same name. Even though the names aren't really hierarchical, people tend to think that a sub-namespace is really a subclass. If you don't want to send that message, In your case, it looks like your application is not intended as a subclass of Net::DNS. I still think something like Sinkhole or DNSinkhole (one s!) would be more app-y. :) -- brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org PAUSE instructions: http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_04about Archives: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules Please send all messages back to modules@perl.org with no CC to me.
