I could live with Marpa2, but I greatly prefer Marpa::R2. I find it easier to work with the various Marpa distributions is they fall into a single top-level domain. And yes, Marpa::R2 will have a new interface.
thanks, jeffrey On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Steffen Mueller <smuel...@cpan.org> wrote: > Hi Jeffrey, > > On 10/09/2011 01:57 PM, Jeffrey Kegler wrote: > >> Marpa::R2 >> > > Don't get me wrong, I don't *mind* Marpa::R2. > > > 1.) Avoids creation of a new top level domain. >> > > In this context, that doesn't matter because any use of Marpa.* would be > considered "Marpa related or misnomer" anyway. > > > 2.) Keeps everything under Marpa. >> > > To what benefit? > > > 3.) Seems consistent with current practice. For example, YAML::XS, >> YAML::Syck, YAML::Old, and YAML::Tiny. >> > > YAML::* is a mess, not a good use of precedence. > > > 4.) Is consistent with previous Marpa versionings: Marpa::XS and >> Marpa::PP. >> > > Are these versions or implementations of the common interface defined by > Marpa? > > I understand Marpa::R2 / Marpa2 would be a new interface version which is > distinctly different from just a different implementation. > > Best regards, > Steffen >
