Hi Mueller, I think you are right it's going to be a waste of effort. Therefore I have dropped the idea. Instead I will use Moose implementation in my future modules that I am going to upload to CPAN. My apologies for wasting your precious time.
Best Regards, Mohammad S Anwar Sent from my iPhone On 8 May 2011, at 18:33, Steffen Mueller <smuel...@cpan.org> wrote: > Hi Mohammad, > > please keep modules@perl.org in the loop so there is not duplicated effort. > > On 05/06/2011 01:29 PM, Mohammad S Anwar wrote: >> You guessed it correctly, its extension to Calendar::* module using Moose. >> If MooseX::* is not the correct place then how can I keep two different >> implementation one with Moose and one without Moose, please suggest? > > Why have two separate implementations? Seems like a waste of effort to me. > > Alas, if that is what you need to do, then at least put the relevant > information first. If the original module is Calendar::Foo, then use > Calendar::Foo::Moose. > > --Steffen
