On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 3:39 AM, brian d foy <brian.d....@gmail.com> wrote:
> [[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
>   the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
>
> In article
> <954223cb-548f-4908-87f8-4007b84c9...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
> gray <g...@cpan.org> wrote:
>
>> I am requesting ownership of the namespace Digest::CubeHash as the
>> current assignee has owned it for 3 months [1] and it is still unused.
>
> This is a bit sticky because the author has very recently (three months
> ago) noted interest in this module. That's not a very long time to have
> disappeared, in my opinion. Charles, if you're listening, speak up even
> to say "yes" or "no".
>
>
> Is there another name that you might use for your distribution, even if
> temporarily?
>
> We typically don't make these judgements on anything other than
> respecting the intent of the person who got there first. We don't
> select on better, etc. We just try to make peacable transfers when
> necessary, but in most cases try to get the people involved to work it
> out themselves. :)
>
> --
> brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org
> PAUSE instructions:  http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_04about
> Archives: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules
> Please send all messages back to modules@perl.org with no CC to me.
>

Hello :)

There are some problems in my opinion with transferring that namespace.

The module was intended to include a Pure-Perl implementation of the
CubeHash digest,
as well as the XS functionality implemented by Gray's module, and as
such it's taken
me more than 3 months to write; considering the responsibilities of
life and etc.

If I were to just hand the namespace over, I feel that the intended
implementation would never
be complete, and I am a bit dissatisfied with this outcome. Most
crypto stuff on CPAN is
lacking a PP implementation, I wanted CubeHash to be the first in a
long string of PP crypto
projects; due to its simplicity. People without C compilers should
have (slow) crypto too :)

On one hand, I registered the module to avoid this issue in the first place.

On the other hand, I understand Mr. Gray's conundrum as well,
it's hard to rename a module when it's sitting next to 14 others with
the same naming scheme.


Perhaps Mr. Gray has a solution to this problem?

If he will not rename his module,
I'd be willing to hand the namespace over if Gray included a Pure-Perl
implementation.

Reply via email to