Brian, Thank you for the pointers. I've deleted those improperly named modules and submitted requests for the new ones. I'm glad that you intervened. Now in hindsight, some of my previous submissions and my local stuff seem to have been not-so-well named.
Live and learn, I guess :) -Kan On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:11 AM, brian d foy <brian.d....@gmail.com> wrote: > [[ This message was both posted and mailed: see > the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] > > In article > <AANLkTi=YhmL2BNsa5vFimyAzx7mdoj2GohcRRLbbF=i...@mail.gmail.com>, Kan Liu > <hrb....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I had hesitated about requesting the "Util" namespace for the reason >> made obvious by your comments. But I overcame my hesitation after >> seeing a few other registered modules in similar vein. > > Following bad examples doesn't make it right. I'd like to see you come > up with good, descriptive names that help people find your modules and > know what they do. > > I think all of your modules probably already fit into an existing > top-level namespace. Don't think they all have to live in the same > namespace. Now it's just a matter of finding the right second-level > namespace that accurately distinguishes your module from others. Our > thoughts on modules names are at: > > https://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_namingmodules > > Good luck :) > > -- > brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org > PAUSE instructions: http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_04about > Archives: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules > Please send all messages back to modules@perl.org with no CC to me. >
