Hi, At 14 Dec 2010 00:52:33 +0000 (UTC) from brian d foy <brian.d....@gmail.com>:
> > In article <20101211103539.45d91c0000...@[smtp01.zmail.com]>, Jan Gehring > <c...@imail.com> wrote: > >> currenty i am working on a module named HTTP::YARM (for yet another routing >> module) and i would like to share it on CPAN. It depends only on the core >> perl modules. ([https://github.com/krimdomu/p5-http-yarm]) >> >> Is the namespace okay for you? > I prefer names that give away what they do. > [...] > Once you > are in the application and deciding what to do based on the URL (or > other info), you aren't in HTTP land anymore. > okay, i've browsed a little the "World Wide Web" list and i think the "CGI::" namespace would fitt better, right? First i though for "WWW::" but it seems to me that the most modules under this namespace are not for CGI/PSGI/FCGI and so on. So what do you think about CGI::Route? CGI::Application::... is already taken for the complete Webframework. Thank you and have a nice day. Jan p.s. i hope that webmailer will do the lineendings right...
