>>>>> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:22:09 -0700, Alan Young <alansyoung...@gmail.com> >>>>> said:
>> The following packages (grouped by status) have been found in the distro: >> >> Status: Permission missing >> ========================== >> >> module: PPI::Document >> version: 0.03 >> in file: lib/PPIx/IndexLines.pm >> status: Not indexed because permission missing. Current registered >> primary maintainer is ADAMK. Hint: you can always find the >> legitimate maintainer(s) on PAUSE under "View Permissions". > Is this a non-issue or is it not acceptable to add a method to an > object for a third party module? We don't judge acceptability. It's a namespace clash and the involved parties in such a clash are responsible to deal with it. I'd suggest you ask on PPI channels for prior art and conventions. -- andreas
