On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 03:32:14PM +0200, brian d foy wrote: > In article <20101116030455.gi12...@agaton.scsys.co.uk>, Matt S Trout > <m...@shadowcat.co.uk> wrote: > > > > This one works in line with Net::Twitter, which is what it's most likely > > to be used with, and is written sanely (Sam works for a Shadowcat client > > and I'll be auditing his code). > > > > As such, I've approved the registration. > > However, none of those things are a recommendation for the proposed > name. I don't make nameing judgements based on the code quality, who > is going to use it, or who the author works for.
The existing modules are awful and consistency with Net::Twitter is a sensible reason. If you'd like to talk to the Net::Twitter author and convince him to rename that I'm sure Sam would be happy to rename in parallel. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our Catalyst commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
