On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 03:34:21AM +0800, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Convert::FEC is good enough for people who are looking for FEC
> implementations. Although if I was to put it on CPAN, I'll probably use
> the Algorithm:: space and call it Algorithm::FEC.
Indeed, I didn't consider Algorithm before. I wouldn't feel perfectly at
home with Algorithm::, but neither do I with Convert.
If I think about usage, I don't think anybody using this FEC module would
ever be interested in the algorithm (and for an algorithm I'd expect more
configurability).
So.... right now I still tend more to Convert, but that's because it's
meerly a tool for me.
But Algorithm is tempting, especially if other modules are already
there. But they have a slgihtly different feeling.
I guess I'll stay with Convetr because it's good either way and I'm too
lazy to change it :)
I'll think about it and tell the list tomorrow or so.
> BTW, I'm very excited to see that a perl-based FEC is at last
> available. Nice work!
I didn't write the bulk of the code, just the perl interface...
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
