>>>>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 01:47:25 +0800, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 07:22:48PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> In my opinion, again is more perlish. Especially because of its >> pragma-like name (compare C<use if>, C<use only>, C<use again>). > It is also confusing: > use Module::Name; > use again 'Module::Name'; > If I know nothing about your module, I'd expect line two to reload > Module::Name unconditionally. But maybe it's just me. Arthur? FWIW, I read like Autrijus. -- andreas
