On torsdag, mar 20, 2003, at 19:01 Europe/Stockholm, Alan Barclay wrote:
Digest::HashCash doesn't seem to be a good place, because it's not performing a digest
Crypt::HashCash same problem, it's not doing crypto
Mail::HashCash would work, except I can see non-mail releated uses.
Hash::HashCash seems to be the least bad fit then.
Any suggestions?
CPU::Waster :-)
Isn't it a digest kind of? Hash::HashCash seems like a bad name because of reduncy?
Arthur
