It was Tuesday, February 25, 2003 when Kurt Starsinic took the soap box, saying: : On Feb 25, Casey West wrote: : > I'm writing a set of modules that deal with scripture (bible) : > specifications and standards, as well as a few for interfacing with : > things from the Sword project (http://www.crosswire.org/sword), and : > I'm perplexed about a namespace. : > : > I want it to be short, something like : > Religion::Christianity::Bible::Spec::GBF is not appealing. : > : > I'm think about a top level Bible::*. I know that there are other : > folks who consider the bible to be something else entirely than a : > Christian bible, so I'm also thinking along the lines of Scripture::*. : > : > Any thoughts would be welcome. : : I don't think that Religion:: is the right top-level namespace. : The module doesn't process theological concepts, it processes text. : I would suggest that you either put your modules under Text::GBF::, : or under SWORD:: (if you're planning on submitting a lot of SWORD- : related modules).
Yes, lots under Sword, and there are several processors, not just GBF, should they all go under Text::, or would a Text::[something here]:: be more appropriate. Also, some of these formats are actually binary in nature. Casey West -- Shooting yourself in the foot with VMS \FOOT\ ambiguous: supply more toes.
