On tisdag, feb 11, 2003, at 08:15 Europe/Stockholm, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
Why not Cartography::Projection::GCTPOn Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:53:16 -0900, Dan Stahlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Greetings, Modules Group: I am about to upload a module that is a wrapper around the GCTPc library. What this module does is convert coordinates from one map projection to another. It is currently named Cartography::Projection, but I am thinking perhaps it should be renamed to Cartography::GCTP so that it would be named after the underlying C library. The advantage is that the name would not clash with future projection libraries that people may write, the disadvantage is that not everyone knows what GCTP is. Do you have any thoughts on this?I prefer Cartography::GCTP because we may expect that cartographers know about the library; and wannabee cartographers should read the READMEs of all modules in the Cartography namespace.-- andreas
Then perhaps in the future Cartography::Project can be a single API against different backends.
Arthur