On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Henrik Tougaard wrote:
> When I saw the modulename I immediately thought of a 'has-a' relationship.
> In UML that is called Agrregation.
> The name ought to convey sa better idea of what the module does -
> Class::Aggregate is IMHO just too generic. I can't think of a better name
> though.
I know, that's my quandry as well. Let's face it: there's no reasonably
short name that's going to be desriptive enough. So, if not that, how about:
Class::Lite (since it's a relatively light-weight implementation)
Class::Orderly (referencing the point of the container relationship
for destruction purposes)
Hell, call it Class::Foo, for all I care, I'd just like to get an officially
sanctioned module that does what I want and can be reused across all the
Curses::* modules I'm working on. I'm getting tired of duplicating code. . .
Any ideas?
--Arthur Corliss
Bolverk's Lair -- http://arthur.corlissfamily.org/
Digital Mages -- http://www.digitalmages.com/
"Live Free or Die, the Only Way to Live" -- NH State Motto
