Now it looks like a bikeshed problem to me. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#BIKESHED-PAINTING
Sorry about that. >>>>> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:09:45 +0100, Mark Overmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > For my feeling, the focus of all responses till now is that the main issue > about user information is that it is stored in an address book. For me, the > main issue is that it is easily accessible and smart. If an Addressbook::Entry object is not easily accessible and smart it is clearly not an option. Otherwise it might be good for reuse. > A User::Indentity combines information from many sources for a temporal > existence. Calling the module anything which implies that it is persistent > information is wrong. Calling it anything which restricts itself to a > single source of data is a mistake as well. The name Addressbook::Entry does not necessarily imply persistency or single data source. It's just a metapher everybody understands. -- andreas
