In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arthur Corliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In short, I think you would do well to note that dumping it from CPAN would be > a disservice to those already using it, and expecting it to be there. I would > also be somewhat disheartened to have this list go back on a decision that > they already made: > > http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09570.html the only thing i see there is that Tim suggested a name. i do not see any decision or plurality. i'm was not suggesting that you dump it from CPAN, but that we try to work together to reduce parallel development and duplication of effort. i typically suggest that when i see someone submit a module that is very similar to another one. however, i think you have made it clear that you do not want to do that. i don't think Parse is the right name---it only describes part of your module, since you also write the structure back to a file. indeed, you could use your module for its intended task without ever parsing anything. furthermore, this sort of task does not fit in with most of the other modules in Parse::*. the task seems much more suited to either the Config:: or ConfigReader:: namespaces, and that is where i think you should register it. -- brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org please send all messages back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
