In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'm proposing to use the name Test::MonteCarlo, as it's somewhat like a > Monte Carlo simulation. i don't think you should use Monte Carlo since you really aren't sinmulating a system. Monte Carlo simulations pick sensible random values from a defined frequency distribution and apply those to part of a system. your module would hopefully pick unsensible values too, and i don't think you'll need the frequency distribution. i also don't think most people will know what "Monte Carlo" means. how about Test::RandomData or some such? -- brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org please send all messages back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
