On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 07:11:24PM -0400, brian d foy wrote: > On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Tim Bunce wrote: > > i see your point about Net::*. it's hard to tell how low-level is low > though. :)
:) > > WebService::FreeDB > > can't that just fit under WWW::* somehow? I think WWW::* is best kept for modules that are web related but not tied to a specific web service. Most of what's in WWW::* now fits that definition well and there's pleanty of scope for more. By adding WebService:: we reduce the risk of future bloat to both the Net::* and WWW::* categories. Tim.
