On Thursday 08 August 2002 17:05, Geoffrey Young wrote: > I was thinking about releasing Acme::No to CPAN but wanted to make > sure that it follows the spirit of the Acme:: namespace properly.
I am not a great specialist of Acme::* modules, but I /think/ it boils down to whether you intend to whether you think your module ought to be used seriously or not ;) If you do, I then think no one will use it if it's in Acme. If that's the case, then maybe you'd be happier in the ex::* namespace, indicating an experimental pragma. Then again that may give the impression that it's blessed as being under review by p5p which unless you push it further there (and it may be a good idea as "no LWP 6.0.0" complaining that it only has version 5.65 is a bit counter-intuitive -- or at least a syntactical hole) is not the case iirc. Or perhaps under Perl::* given that it modifies Perl semantics for a keyword, eg Perl::NotVersion or something similar. I'm not recommending any of these specifically, just trying to suggest alternatives to Acme::* if your module is "serious" (which to me it seems to be). -- Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> As a computer, I find your faith in technology amusing.
