On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 05:03:32PM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote:
> On tisdag, juli 30, 2002, at 04:49 , Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> > Isn't very descriptive. What is it?
> >
> > Tim.
>
> I wrote that in my proposal some time ago
Umm, Google found this for me:
There is a need for a new set of data type modules on CPAN that
allows abstract defined interfaces to data types with multiple
implmentations.
This comes from an attempt to remove the some Queue and Priority
Queue code from POE, and making it possible to switch implmentations
for different types of data.
The current data type modules are spread out all over, they also
lack a standard interface, and many are, frankly extremely poorly
implemented.
ADT stands for Adstract Data Types.
I follow that. And things like ADT::Queue::Priority make a lot of sense.
> New top level for implmentation of Abstract Data Types.
What I don't follow is what an ADT.pm would contain.
Tim.
