On måndag, juli 29, 2002, at 12:50 , Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> > At 10:44 AM 7/29/02 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: >> "Thread::Needs" isn't a very descriptive name - it's too general. >> Something like "Thread::NeedsModules" would be better. > > Hmmm... if that's the only problem you have with it, I'm glad... ;-) > > I was considering something like this, but thought the huffmann coded > name Thread::Needs would be sufficient. > > Do you have anything particular in mind with which Thread::Needs could > confuse people (other than it being applicable to modules?). > > I thought that: > > Thread::Needs qw(This::Module That::Module); > > is pretty descriptive and shows what it's supposed to do. But then I > may be suffering from tunnel vision in this respect... ;-) > > > Liz > I have been thinking maybe it should be called Thread::Modules; use Thread::Modules qw(foo bar baz); #these must be cloned no Thread::Modules qw(don't need this); #these should not be cloned ? Arthur
