> having both a Proc::PID_File module and a Proc::PID::File > module doesn't help people.
sorry, I didn't explain myself correctly. there will not be 2 modules, only one, reclassified, and Steven has asked me to maintain it. > There's no need for the extra level of name here the space Proc::PID should actually become a family of which File is only a member, there is other PID related functionality that could use that space like Proc::PID::Of - e -----Original Message----- From: Tim Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 4:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Module submission Proc::PID::File On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:38:36AM +0200, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote: > > The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: > > modid: Proc::PID::File > DSLIP: Rdphp > description: check whether a process is already runnning > userid: ECALDER (Erick Calder) > chapterid: 4 (Operating_System_Interfaces) > communities: > > similar: > Proc::PID_File - reclassifying > > rationale: > > I've talked to the developer of Proc::PID_File and he has asked me > to maintain and reclassify his Proc::PID_File as Proc::PID::File > which makes more sense. There's no need for the extra level of name here and having both a Proc::PID_File module and a Proc::PID::File module doesn't help people. Whatever the differences in functionality are between the two modules should be expressed somehow in the names. The suggested change doesn't. Tim.
