On 11 Oct 2001, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 09:47:07 -0600 (MDT), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >> I have the impression you're taking a namespace for a function. > >> Wouldn't it be more logical to have a class HTML::DataConvert or some > >> such and have mthods in there that accomplish all related tasks. > >> > >> There's certainly more than one possible name for such a class, but > >> HTML::DataConvert is the first that comes to my mind. > > > It might sound like an easy thing to convert html to an array of arrays, > > Oh no, certainly no, I didn't impose that, but as the librarian deputy > I take a bird's eye view on the books and try to shape the namespaces > they are using. As such I see a merit in a marriage of your two > modules into one. The underlying implementation can then use any > amount of namespaces below HTML::DataConvert to gain > speed/memory/convenience as much as needed. I'd like to point out that > the word "result" looks pretty useless in the namespaces you proposed.
Ok, fair enough. I am willing to put my stuff about anywhere. I just posted to comp.lang.perl.modules just to see if anyone had other ideas. Let me see what sort of feedback I get from there. Thanks, Earl
