>>>>> On Sun, 7 Oct 2001 23:05:18 -0400, Brian Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> _Maybe_ it could be argued that this could live under the 'IPC' > heirarchy. If the Powers-That-Be want to argue such a change into > place, I guess I could go with that. > But, this module has been available on CPAN for months now, and I > know that some people are using it, so, if nothing else, I plea > that for the sake of running code, I don't change the namespace > spuriously. Fine with me. I wasn't comfortable when I registered it, but gave in because of the Open2 and Open3 precedent. IPc would have been a marvellous better idea and I regret I didn't come up with the idea. Oh well! -- andreas
