On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 23:27:26 -0500, in perl.modules you wrote: > In perl.modules, you wrote: > >Vote 1 Philip Newton for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] cabal! > > ping?
pong? Were you expecting a reply? Come *on* -- this was blackhole^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^[EMAIL PROTECTED] you sent the message to! Where messages disappear in a space/time warp and pop up again three to twenty weeks in the future! Seriously, though; whom did you expect to reply? As for me, I feel honoured and slightly scared[1] by the prospect. But since you also said > Philip is clued and obviously interested in what goes on here. I think > we should formalise the arrangement. , I think you (also?) wanted someone who actually has the power to decide such things to comment. Cheers, Philip [1] Mostly because my CFT pool is not that much bigger than anyone else's, and because I'm not really up on the case law here besides the little bits and pieces that you pick up -- e.g. "Don't start a new top-level namespace without good justification".
