>>>>> On Thu, 10 May 2001 17:12:27 +0100, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...serious caveats to autouse omitted...]
> So there's enough differences, I'd think, to let AnyLoader in. It was
> originally written as "Hey, UNIVERSAL::AUTOLOAD, that's a neat idea!"
Ahh, I see.
I still have doubt about the name. We have AutoLoader, DynaLoader,
SelfLoader, ByteLoader, XSLoader so what I would expect from an
AnyLoader is that it replaces all those five. "auto" should be in the
name. Maybe autorequire? Can we safely say it is a pragma?
--
andreas
