>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 11:23:43 -0500, "Riad S. Wahby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Net::ConnectTunnel seems a bit clumsy, but I can't really think of
> anything better. Net::Tunnel would cover too much, as it's not a
> general tunnelling module. Eventually, I'd like to extend the module
> to include other ways of tunnelling through HTTP proxies, at which
> point the name Net::HTTPTunnel would become appropriate; perhaps it's
> better just to assign that now. In truth, either ConnectTunnel or
> HTTPTunnel would be fine with me.
HTTP::Tunnel ?
--
andreas
