Re: Namespace dor Director/Shockwave related modules

[Martin Langhoff]

John Porter wrote:

> Generally speaking, you don't get a top-level namespace without a very
> compelling reason.

Agreed. These tiny modules are *not* a compeling reason. That's why I'm
asking around.

> That leaves Shockwave::Lingo.

Anyway, I'd be asking for the Shockwave namespace ... as it has not been
used! I'd be putting my modules in a 3rd level namespace, though.

Shockwave::Lingo::Foo, then ? 


Martin