Chris Nandor wrote:
>
> Well, h2xs already creates a reasonable module framework, which I think is
> just fine. If people used it, we would not have a lot of the problems we
> have, and I don't see people using some external module when they won't use
> h2xs. I am not necessarily opposed to the idea, I just don't know if it
> will accomplish the goal you want to accomplish.
You may be right, but I wasn't talking about the build of the module
package as much as the module itself. Unless there's something h2xs does
that I'm not aware of? I use h2xs to build all my packages, but I'm not
aware of it being able to provide a stub module, which is what I'm
talking about here. But I could be wrong (if so, please correct me).
-Nate
