On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 01:31:49AM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:22:34 +0000, Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > How about we go for Symbol::Approx::Sub? We've had a discussion on
> > the mailing list and that seems to be our favourite.
>
> > Please let me know what you think - as I am giving a talk to
> > london.pm on the module this week and would like to know what to
> > call it :)
>
> Tell them how hard good naming is:-)
I most certainly will :)
> Symbol::Approx::Sub is fine by me, but I'm still not convinced that
> abandoning Sub::Approx was necessary.
OK. Let's go with Symbol::Approx::Sub then. I'll upload a next version to CPAN with
the new name and using Devel::Symdump in the next couple of days.
Thanks for your help.
Dave...
--
http://www.dave.org.uk | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Be careful what you dream of, it may come up and surprise you"
- Ian MacNabb
