-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>You could try to first contact him and ask if he is willing to surrender
>the name to you. Although, if his module seems to be in some significant
>use, that might not be appropriate, unless you had the same interface.
>Otherwise, then another name for your module might be best.
Well, according to the readme, the module is quite beta, so I doubt
that its use is widespread. Thus, if I can get Mr. Goldsmith's
permission, I will continue using this name. As far as getting
permission, this is exactly why I CCed the original mail to him. I'm
going to hope that he responds; if he does not, I'll assume that the
project has been abandoned and keep using Net::AIM.
If it turns out that I do have to change the name, it is time to
restart the thread concerning what it should be called. How does
Net::AOLIM sound? I'm fairly certain that it's not taken :-)
Riad Wahby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5105
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBOW/si4h6K+kZMcamEQL3CACg8mDOzhj/e0n3WXDnQABX+QvFG/cAoNB2
zQ5FuRethHfrp9Rkq4lI6FkK
=2F8s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
