On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 07:19:49PM -0400, Chris Nandor wrote:
> At 16.40 -0400 2000.07.06, Riad Wahby wrote:
> >I also have a question as to naming my module. I had been planning to
> >call the module Net::InstMsg; however, upon reading the guidelines, I
> >found that it is likely that Net::InstantMessenger is a better module
> >name. Which do you suggest I use? If neither of these seems
> >acceptable, what would you suggest?
>
> Because it is such a common acronym, I'd think Net::IM or Net::AIM might be
> acceptable, though I am fairly sure others will disagree.
Please not Net::IM, Net::InstantMessenger, or Net::InstMsg! There are
lots of instant messaging protocols out there, and I can tell you from
personal experience that the number is growing very quickly. Net::AIM is
fine by me . . . .
Peace,
* Kurt Starsinic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---------- Senior Network Engineer *
| `It is always possible to aglutenate multiple separate problems |
| into a single complex interdependent solution. In most cases |
| this is a bad idea.' - Ross Callon |
