[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig) wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 1 Apr 2000 09:50:47 -0600, Ken Williams
>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>> I was hesitating when I looked over this one, because neither your
>>> README nor your manpage give me any clue about the difference between
>>> Tie::IxHash and Tie::LLHash. The few words leave me with RTFS, but I'd
>>> recommend to WTFM ;)
>
> > The following paragraph is in the docs:
> >
> > See also Tie::IxHash by Gurusamy Sarathy. It's similar (it also does
> > ordered hashes), but it has a different internal data structure and a
> > different flavor of usage. It makes your hash behave more like a list
> > than this does. This module keeps more of the hash flavor.
> >
> > I agree, I could add more detail about what the differences are. I'll
> > do that now.
>
>Thanks. I've read the new sentence. So would you not believe that the
>description in the module list could be tuned as well, maybe to
>contain the words "linked" and "list"?
Good idea - done.
"Fast ordered hashes via linked lists"
------------------- -------------------
Ken Williams Last Bastion of Euclidity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Math Forum
