>>>>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:24:06 +1100, "Kim Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,
> could someone please reply.
I'm sorry, the Tuits shortage is entirely my own fault, I'm back for a
few days. I'm trying to get something done.
> I really want to use this module in my module, Lingua::EN::AddressParse,
> but don't like forcing people to look in user directories.
Out of curiosity: why?
> Can anyone
> explain why this module doesn't exist in the Geography directory, or if
> Locale::States is a better name for it (as Locale directory already exists).
> If yes, then I can suggest to the author that it could be renamed.
I see nothing grossly wrong with Geography::States and am going to
register it now in the module list. Locale:: on the other hand is
associated with what you can read in locale.pm, a highly confusing and
incomplete standard that has nothing to do with states. I wouldn't
endorse a name change to Locale::
> It is very frustrating to be kept in the dark . Many postings here,
> particularly submissions to the module list just go ignored.
Maybe it helps to think about it as a failure tolerant system. Somehow
it works even if some key positions are vacant or dormant or just
sick. It produces unnecessary frustration, but at least it keeps
going. Thanks for caring.
--
andreas
