I have uploaded the modules... but I need to make a change in the module list
discription and missed where that is done... (See below)

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 14:46:55 -0700 (MST)
> From: John Halleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Submission.
> 
> 1) Name:             John Halleck
> 2) email address:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 3) home page:        http://www.cc.utah.edu/~nahaj/
> 4) prefered CPAN ID: HALLECK
> 5) Discription of what I'm planning to contribute:
>    Two perl modules.  One a direct implementation of RFC 2396 for
>    relative and absolute paths, and the other a direct implementation
>    of RFC 2396 for relative and absolute paths.
>    (RFC 2396 responds to complaints about some browsers doing absolute
>    and relative path conversion incorrectly, and missparsing of url's
>    by browsers...  It states officially exactly the way they work.)
> 6) for modules a description in module list format
> Name           DSLI  Description                                  Info
> -------------  ----  -------------------------------------------- -----
> paths          Rdpf  RFC 2396 relative and absolute paths code    HALLECK
> urls           Rdpf  RFC 2396 relative and absolute URLS code     HALLECK

  I would like to update that information with:

Name           DSLI  Description                                  Info
-------------  ----  -------------------------------------------- -----
urlparse       Rdpf  RFC 2396 dictated URL parseing code          HALLECK
paths          Rdpf  RFC 2396 relative and absolute paths code    HALLECK
urls           Rdpf  RFC 2396 relative and absolute URLS code     HALLECK
 
> 7) It would be very nice, if you could also send a note about where you have
>    discussed some or all parts of your contribution publicly, and if there was
>    at least a little bit of interest. We are quite open for submissions, but
>    we owe our users at least some rudimentary quality control
> 
> They have been discussed and used by various organizations at this campus,
> they've not been discussed outside of that.  They have gone over well,
> and have been used extensively here.
> 

Reply via email to