From: Leon Timmermans <faw...@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 2:31 PM
To: Todd Rinaldo <todd.rina...@webpros.com>
Cc: Philippe Bruhat (BooK) <b...@cpan.org>, Russ Allbery <ea...@eyrie.org>, 
module-authors@perl.org <module-authors@perl.org>
Subject: Re: Guidance on the implications of the Lyon Amendment
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:24 PM Todd Rinaldo 
<todd.rina...@webpros.com<mailto:todd.rina...@webpros.com>> wrote:
I continue to wonder if there’s value in setting this up. Who needs 5.6 or 5.8, 
etc. so desperately that we need to maintain this stream? How do we know when 
they don’t need it?

>Module::Build::Tiny hasn't been installable on a clean 5.8 for over a year 
>(because CPAN::Meta::Requirements now requires 5.10) and I >didn't get any 
>emails/tickets about it; so it doesn't appear to be very alive. I'm expecting 
>5.10 to be very different though (because RHEL >6).

RHEL 6 and 7 are VERY dead. People are actively scrambling to get off them. I 
would expect that things like updating from CPAN are very much off people’s 
radar.

Which leaves you with Perl 5.32 as far as supported RedHat  8 goes.

https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=redhat

Reply via email to