On 22/10/15 12:39, Matthew Astley wrote:
Cool! The Bus::I2C:: namespace seems safe. Short, unambiguous,
unlikely to have a legitimate claim from software.
I would personally keep Device, most of the hardware-related stuff on
CPAN (not much, but still) is already in that namespace.
Bus, by itself, is far from unambiguous to me
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus). On the other hand, I think I2C and
SPI are familiar enough to people working - or playing - with electronics.
So I would go for:
Device::I2C
Device::SPI
Which are hardware-abstract, and subclassed if/when needed
(Device::I2C::FT232H, etc.).
Just my personal opinion.
cheers,
Aldo
