Hello everyone, In my opinion, ComputeCluster is way too long for a root module name. Plus, T9 in my head would type "ComputerCluster" instead.
Maybe something like HighLoad:: or HPC:: would be better as a root name? Not sure though. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:18 PM, John Macdonald <john.macdon...@oicr.on.ca> wrote: > I generally think the name has to be useful for people to decide quickly > whether it is useful or irrelevant to their purposes. A cryptic TLA makes > it easy for the people who recognize it to decide that it is what they > want, but makes it hard for people who don't know the TLA to decide that > they can ignore it. HPC would be short to type and meaningful to the > users, but would be a confusing noise to many others. > > *John Macdonald* > Software Engineer > > *Ontario Institute for Cancer Research* > MaRS Centre > > 661 University Avenue > > Suite 510 > Toronto, Ontario > > Canada M5G 0A3 > > Tel: > > Email: john.macdon...@oicr.on.ca > > Toll-free: 1-866-678-6427 > Twitter: @OICR_news > > > *www.oicr.on.ca <http://www.oicr.on.ca/>* > > This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or > privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any > review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was > originally intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > message in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this message may > not be that of the organization. > ------------------------------ > *From:* Alex Muntada [alex.munt...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* September 5, 2014 9:04 AM > *To:* John Macdonald > *Cc:* module-authors@perl.org > *Subject:* Re: Top level name proposal - ComputeCluster > > What about HPC::? > > BTW, we have SGE at work too so this seems very interesting :-) > > Cheers! > Alex >
