Am Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:58:54 +0100 schrieb Jean-Damien Durand
<jeandamiendur...@free.fr>:
Hello,
I have been adviced by daxim@cpan that Jperl (c.f. [1]) is a bad name,
and it is! May I ask for suggestions;
The project is a JavaScript engine written in perl.
AST is already done, and I plan to write the engine itself using a
internal JavaScript source code translation into a Perl source code, a
priori using MooseX::Prototype, or Class::Prototyped.
Should the name mention explicitely the implementation, or could it be
stand-alone but /not/ Jperl -;
Thanks for any suggestion / JD.
[1] http://blogs.perl.org/users/jean-damien_durand/2013/10/jperl.html
How about "robusta"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robusta_coffee
