Yes, it is about text and to that extent Text::SentiWordNet does make sense. I was just thinking of WordNet::* because SWN is derived from WordNet and it might be important to show that association.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:10 PM, John M. Gamble <jgam...@ripco.com> wrote: > On Tue, August 27, 2013 2:08 am, Ashish Mukherjee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am exploring use of the SentiWordNet lexicon for a particular use case. > > Though WordNet does have perl interfaces, SWN doesn't seem to. I would > > like > > to validate this with the group. > > > > Also, if it is indeed true that there is no such module, I would think of > > making a CPAN contribution. Would WordNet::Sentiment or > > WordNet::SentiWordNet be appropriate names for the module? > > > > Regards, > > Ashish > > > > Text::SentiWordNet perhaps? I had to do a search, and the first site that > I found (<http://sentiwordnet.isti.cnr.it/>) gave me the impression that > it's all about the text. > > -john > > >
