On 05/02/2012 10:01 AM, Bill Ward wrote: > > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Daniel Lukasiak <est...@estrai.com > <mailto:est...@estrai.com>> wrote: > > On 02/05/12 00:49, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > > On May 1, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 wrote: > > If removal isn't possible is there any other mechanism > (forced > depreciation?) that can be used? > > You could take it over and fix it… > > > > I'd be more than happy to contribute but only if that would > provide any value. > In this case I think there's more value in removing this broken > module, there are much better alternatives. > I understand this is a problem with CPAN's nature, but there must > be a line somewhere. > > > Taking it over only to deprecate it might be a solution.
This is the route that was taken with the old and broken Net::IRC module I believe.