On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Xiong Changnian <xiong-c...@xuefang.com> wrote: > I'm looking for a top-level namespace to put Hump under. I expect quite > a few submodules under the *::Hump:: but filling in that * is my goal > today. Absent violent objection, I plan to keep the 'Hump' part of the > name.
Is this Perl-specific? Most perl developer tools seem to be winding up under Module::* or Dist::* I agree with Ricardo that "Hump" has some negative meanings (as well as positive ones like "carry") so I do suggest you consider those factors as well. -- David
