On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
On Apr 2, 2010, at 1:50, Arthur Corliss wrote:
And my assertion has been that the excessive stats by the server are a bigger
impediment to synchronization than the inode count.
Well, then one of us don't understand how file systems etc work. :-)
Indeed. If you're running UFS perhaps you might have a gripe. But with
many filesystems in use supporting dynamic allocation groups with the inode
data stored near the actually data blocks, along with b-tree indexing, this
isn't as much of an issue for many of us.
--Arthur Corliss
Live Free or Die
